INDEPTH; Why There May Be More Energy For The Atomic Motor if The Angle Is Bevelled Inward To The Radius of The Weak Charges

...

....Since protons and other heavy particles aren't radiating out much energy of the earth if the strong force is 137 times as strong as the electromagnetic field, why is the value of the speed of tunneling by experiment Chin found just 1.2 times the speed of light not 137 times this speed? (Here's why I think Chin may have found proof of faster than light, my physics synopses page, with about 8 or more proofs in favor of Faster than Light, plus how to prove GWD my General Wave Dynamics causology) By F=ma, the more general form of E=mc2 which would apply to all forces and relativity including both gravity and the strong force, this is about linear motion of the lower energy fields (about gravity) and since angular motion is nonlinear, and the opposite, with increased mass density like the value 137, it would seem to go 137 times as fast in angular motion, but Chin's tunnelling speed is slower. There would be this strong force field spinning around much faster than the electric charges, which would just be somewhat lighter and with the fractional charges (a charge of 1/2 would spin at twice the speed of light and a charge of 1/3 could spin around at 3x the speed of light, with these values averaged out to the speed Chin found, you lighten up to travel faster by F=ma).. With the relative motion between the faster strong field (at 137 times the speed of light) and the fractional charges (at 1.2x the speed of light or so) the relative speed of these two waves, the strong force and the fractional electric charges would be large so it would seem there would be much radiation emitted from the earth when the strong force with continual flexing of the slower electric charges. A possible explanation might be about efficiency. There are two sets of two forces in physics. If gravity is like the strong force, as electromagnetism has already been likened to the weak force in the Electroweak theory, by our general savvy about gravity we may see more about why this is true of the strong force than otherwise, so some general conclusions might be drawn. (Gravity can be unified in general with the strong force because both gravity and the strong force are only attractive and longer range than the shorter range centrifugal expansive contact (electromagnetic and weak) forces that stop otherwise indefinite implosion.) Einstein thought gravity waves moved at the speed of light, I believe because it's lighter it may move at much faster than light by F=ma, the density of the gravity m is much lower and you lighten up to travel faster. If either faster than light or just the slower speed Einstein predicted, gravity is much faster as it flows through us than our usual motion of mass at 32 ft. I think this may be explained by inefficiency, certainly there must be extra left over gravity more than entropy to hold the cosmos together so it wouldn't radiate out over infinite time and not violate energy conservation, thus the gravity would flow through us inefficiently with a good bit of extra field flowing without interaction with the mass it flows around, and if the strong force in general outline is like gravity it could also flow past the electric charges of the hadrons as they would spin around without much actual interaction other than just enough to make them go at the predicted speed of my causeology of GWD and lighten up their charges just this much. The strong force can't just implode indefinitely or infinitely, it's implosion must be stopped by some force but not electromagnetism, it's too weak, and the strong force is only implosive, this is why I've often said the real source of the outward expansion of radioactivity and nuclear power isn't the strong force (it's always implosive) rather it's the so called weak force. It's weak at long range, and by this explanation it would be stronger than even the strong force at the source of most mass of the baryon or meson. One good reason to believe the Weak Force is actually strong is because Weak interactions are much faster than electromagnetic reactions. If time is caused by angular momentum because all time is measured by periodic fluxuation and the Weak force is faster, by conservation of angular momentum it spins faster at least "inside". By Relativity the weak interactions could be no faster than electromagnetic interactions at the speed of light. If they are stronger the Weak Interactions may be both faster than light and stronger than all other force. Another good reason to believe the Weak Interaction is strong before renormalization is the neutrino, it's so light and feeble only weak interactions are strong enough to create them. By the electroweak theory the Weak Force behaves much like the electromagnetic force; like this force it has two fermionic charges and a bosonic mediating charge, like plus and minus electric charges and light, respectively. Most importantly, by the electroweak theory it's a contact force that generates friction and does work when squeezed by the strong force, this is how radioactivity is via the longer range only attractive strong force and short range contact expansion of the weak force, like the gravity squeezing out the heat of the earth in the other main action reaction pair of physics. The fractional electric charges may be in their relativistic (inertial) rest frame and the strong force may be mostly inefficient like gravity through us, this would explain why the protons and neutrons may not emit lots of radiation and be radioactive even with faster than light spin allowed. (Usual probes being themselves made mostly of electricity wouldn't measure the faster than light motion of the strong force mostly either because like the electric charges, they wouldn't interact and just move at the speed of light or somewhat faster, at long range all the spins would add up to just the speed of light so relativity would hold up well at higher radii because the spin quantum numbers are much linked to the electric charge numbers).

-
So there is the longer range electromagnetic shell of the heavy particle, the strong force that would zoom right past the electric charges without a lot of interaction, but with enough from the much faster than light more dense strong force than electromagnetism to cause a somewhat faster than light speed of the outside charges found by Chin's experiments and explaining the fractional electric charges, and the strong force mostly would implode to the short range (strongest of all) weak force and this reacts back out under pressure to power atomic reactions. The good news for the atomic motor may be that while the strong force or electron beams of larger radius may not strongly mix with the electric charges more than this, the weak force (being much stronger, what else) would interact strongly, powering higher energy events than electricity. And unlike the Strong Force, the Weak Force has more friction by the equivalence of the electromagnetic and Weak force in the Electroweak theory. A beam like the electron beam in the atomic motor deeper in than the outer radius of the strong or electric field wouldn't be accelerated there at the lower energy than the weak force to much faster than light (because of inefficient interaction of the strong force with the probe). The equivalent change of wavelength of the electron or other type of beam (the change of wavelength is an inner change in the speed of the particle, itself faster than light because often it's already at the speed of light so any change in speed must reach it at faster than light to change it internally) even if the input power beam has a change of wavelength to collect the useful power still may not be nearly as much of a change as that of interaction with the Weak charge at lower radii. Thus while the atomic motor may not be of much worth just to collect power from the outer inertial field of electric charges or even the strong field (there may be some power here, but just to changes in wavelength corresponding to just somewhat faster than light) it may well be of worth to bevel the ray inward to the most powerful realm of the field, which would interact with the power ray more strongly, and this would be because the weak particle would be a contact charge and even spin at much faster than light than the strong force. The speed of light may be a limit on the general density of fields by my general use of Maxwell's idea that the speed of light was exactly found based on the idea of a resilient medium, changing the density would change the speed. By relativity the strong force and the (stronger) weak force with more density than the speed of light are not allowed, more spinning density, like an ice skaters arms, causes faster spin. Gravity being a much lower power field would perhaps be much faster than the strong force by linear F=ma, you spin faster with more density but might move faster in linear motion with density on S Beach.

PHYSICS SYNOPSES Faster Than Light? GWD May be The Answer. Physics Links ATOMIC MOTOR

...

Notarized by Ronnie Rollyson Website Manager
..

COPYRIGHT 2007-2009 by Charles Fredrick Lawson.

.....

What If The Reduction of Strong Centrifugal Force By Aligning The Poles of The Particles Is Still Insufficient To Achieve Fusion?

There is another possible option to achieve fusion with subatomic machines, the protons and neutrons would be in columns NS NS, one column of protons and one of neutrons held in the columns by the magnetic fields (the neutron has a short range field just as atoms with 0 electric charge have valence to hold with short range electric or magnetic fields) and in cones to tubes of protons or atoms of positive valence for stability. The opposite strong force of the poles with reduced centrifugal strong force and no electric repulsion of atoms would attract more than in usual fusion machines, each opposite strong force pole would implode by fusion without so much resistance as in other machines, and like a set of dominoes or fireworks, each implosion would pull in more of the opposite strong force protons and neutrons, making the reaction both self sustaining and exothermic. The problem of the radiation of too many neutrons common in other machines would be solved by more implosion of the field much like Lehner's Focus Fusion and the lower power needed to sustain the reaction, and the other problem of metal erosion of machines being caused by the radioactivity even with reduced nonthermal radiation may be solved both by the cones being without much surface area when they are are tubes and the cones at an angle, and the reaction would be far from the cones, just chains of the protons and neutrons being imploded, this may even be 10 feet from the cones because it would be powered by the strong implosion. There may be no other machine here than the implosion of the chains of the particles and the cones that move them in the general area so the reaction is caused mostly by the self sustaining process without much more than the cones ands the chains. Even so if this plan of just putting columns of NS NS protons an neutrons together in hopes of fusion by the implosion of the strong force (the Fusor Cone) doesn't work a more complex plan using pressure may be of worth;

You can exert force on the column of protons by just using electrons bound to the protons that then bind to other atoms like a lever with strong pressure because pressure is force per unit area, with the strong force of the small size of the column of protons they could exert more force to fuse than usual atomic fields with a good number of atoms pressing on the proton column to build up the pressure of the end proton to fuse with the neutron.
~~

The simple plan would be to actually just adhere atoms of negative valence on the inner electric field of the tube holding the protons by way of the electric field of the atom. With the nucleus well aligned with this proton ram of high inertia, coherence, and pressure, the fusion would be more probable. It seems easy to calculate if this would work. The known amount of density and force needed to cause fusion is known, and the improved probability of the fusion by alignment of the poles is with that much more force to overcome the known amount of centrifugal force. These are the only two general components; with the density per unit time known, it's easy to take the data about fusion machines like the Tokamac since a certain amount of reaction takes place (not enough to break even with the Tokamac) if almost all of this is caused by polar alignment. From the density needed and the alignment this is an easy way to see if this Plan for The Fusor Cone would be of worth with the improvement of polar alignment and reduced resistance to the electric and strong force to overcome the "centrifugal" resistance to the strong force and electromagnetic field of other machines.

..

A problem might seem to be about the cohesion of the strong force particles in the atom. If they were more with adhesion by the strong "magnetic" force of the NS NS of each proton and neutron and not so much because of the centrifugal force of each baryon, the poles would align and the atoms would fuse in common physics around us at STP. However the nucleus of atoms around us have centrifugal force and these machines like The Fusor Cone may have almost none, so the force needed to cause implosion and fusion may be much reduced.

Another possibility may be to ram the protons into an atom or chain of atoms that would hold the neutrons and use the magnetic field of the atoms to funnel in the protons with the inertia of the atoms holding the neutrons more stable. Atoms of low atomic mass would be used because heavier atoms would cause fission not fusion with the usual radioactivity of fission we hope to solve. This motif may be used with the cup to hold the atoms well, see below.

..

If the simple Fusor Cone is unviable because of e.g. alignment problems, or if the inertia of the nucleus of the target neutrons doesn't create enough resistance to the ram, a more complex way to achieve fusion might be tried;

...

THE WORLD CUP IN A TRIUMPHANT COMBINATION OF THE ONE... Neutrons have no electric charge except at short distances where the plus and minus that combine to make the 0 charge are in power, so you can't add electrons on to the neutrons to hold them in a cup of neutrons just by making the cup out of atoms alone. (Neutrons wouldn't just be linked to protons and then to electrons to hold neutrons as I say above, because with binding by the strong force the baryons would wrap around to a giant nucleus like U 238 and explode by radioactivity, thus to build larger big little structures out of the strong force other lower power methods would be used.) Unlike with the proton method above a neutron can't be held by the same type of anchor and tube. The best way to clamp neutrons and hold them strong if a simple Fusor Cone as above doesn't work may be to link neutron to neutrons in a cup shape by adhesion with the short range magnetic field of each neutron, then adhering the neutrons in the cup out to other neutrons in radiating spokes like a wagon wheel, add protons to the ends of the spokes and so on, and then add other electrons and atoms to the protons to anchor the cup so when the ram implodes it would have more force to cause the fusion. A way to hold the neutrons well may be to make a ring of neutrons held by the NS NS electric field of near radii of the neutrons all the way around the circle. Two or more of these circles bound into a tube with a neutron at the bottom of the tube would make the cup. This would give a solid cup for the proton column to press on the neutron in hopes of fusion by the combination of reduced centrifugal strong force, pressure from the column, and no external electric field of the atoms to overpower like in the Tokamac or other types of conventional fusion machines that have been more unviable cosmos in a jar.

The cup exerts pressure on the neutron or neutron column by way of the poles of the cup neutrons being like facing to the neutron so they wouldn't attract. The electric field of the neutrons being a combination of plus and minus charges is stable at short range.

Once the neutron or neutron column and the proton column were in the neutron cup and the proton tube, with the opposite strong force NS NS spins of the end protons and neutrons already aligned, the neutrons would be at rest in the cup and the proton column would be either moved by acceleration of the whole column by way of the proton column's electric field or slower pressure would be used like with a lever with large force per unit of area and when combined with the other advantages to fuse, or both pressure and speed in optimal amount would be used. The neutron with no electric charge would be best at rest because it wouldn't have an easy way to accelerate to smash into the protons so the neutron would be clamped in the cup in a column and the proton would add power to the more stationary neutron. This might then be self sustaining, the implosion of the strong force poles could pull in the protons and neutrons beside them in the columns with much force, causing more fusion, causing more implosion as the fuel of the protons and neutrons would be achieved with power. The metabolites would just be clean hydrogen like with the Tokamac, and it could be made by self assembling machines in any size from subatomic to more massive.

The main worth of the neutron cup or sphere may be to hold the neutrons in balance. Neutrons unlike a proton or proton wire having no electric charge would have less resistance to the collection ray like an electron beam so it might collect more power.

******

Notarized by Ronnie Rollyson Website Manager

COPYRIGHT 2007-2009 by Charles Fredrick Lawson.
~~